correlational
Analysis v1
0
Pro
48
Against

A new way to measure belly shape — called the conicity index — is the best single sign among all body measurements to predict depression or anxiety in middle-aged Taiwanese men, and still a strong sign in women.

Scientific Claim

The conicity index, a measure of abdominal shape and fat distribution, shows the strongest association with psychiatric morbidity in men (adjusted OR=10.60) and remains strongly associated in women (adjusted OR=2.42), suggesting it may be a superior anthropometric indicator of psychological risk compared to other obesity metrics.

Original Statement

Conicity index (odds ratio [OR] = 23.215; 95% CI [9.998, 53.906])... In multivariate analysis... conicity index... OR=10.601 (95% CI [4.418, 25.437]) for men and OR=2.421 (95% CI [1.633, 3.589]) for women.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

association

Can only show association/correlation

Assessment Explanation

The study reports adjusted ORs with confidence intervals and avoids causal language. The claim accurately reflects the data without overinterpreting clinical utility.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (0)

0
No supporting evidence found

Contradicting (1)

48

The study found that several measures of belly fat, including conicity index, are linked to depression and anxiety, but it didn’t say conicity index is the best one or that it affects men way more than women — so the claim’s specific numbers and claims are not backed up.