After the mid-1960s, fewer people died from heart disease because fewer had heart attacks, and those who did were less likely to die from them — especially before getting to the hospital.

1

Pro

0

Against

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

1

Community contributions welcome

1

The epidemic of the 20(th) century: coronary heart disease.

Narrative Review

Human

2014 Sep

After the 1960s, fewer people died of heart attacks because fewer people got severe heart disease in the first place, and those who did had better treatment — which is exactly what the claim says.

Contradicting (0)

0

Community contributions welcome

No contradicting evidence found

Gold Standard Evidence Needed

According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.

Source Study

The epidemic of the 20(th) century: coronary heart disease.

Score: 1

DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.04.015

Similar Assertions

After the mid-1960s, fewer people died from heart disease because fewer had heart attacks, and those who did were less likely to die — even before getting to the hospital.

1

0

99%

After heart disease killed the most people in the 1960s, fewer people started dying from it because fewer had heart attacks, and when they did, they were less likely to die — plus, fewer people suddenly dropped dead at home.

1

0

94%

After the 1960s, fewer people died from heart disease, and this was likely because better health habits and medical care helped stop plaque from building up in arteries and kept early blockages from getting worse.

1

0

84%

When hospitals got better at treating heart attacks after the 1960s, fewer people died while in the hospital from them.

1

0

81%

After the 1960s, fewer people died from heart disease because better health habits and medical care helped keep arteries from getting clogged and stopped mild blockages from turning into serious ones.

1

0

80%