Doing the most reps didn’t make lifters any stronger than doing fewer reps — more isn’t always better.
Scientific Claim
High-volume resistance training (3,030 repetitions over 10 weeks) does not produce significantly greater strength gains than low-volume training in the snatch, clean & jerk, or squat exercises among experienced junior weightlifters.
Original Statement
“There were no significant differences between the LVG and HVG training volume-induced strength gains.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
probability
Can suggest probability/likelihood
Assessment Explanation
RCT design allows causal interpretation. The claim reflects exact statistical reporting ('no significant differences') and avoids overstatement.
More Accurate Statement
“High-volume resistance training (3,030 repetitions over 10 weeks) may not produce significantly greater strength gains than low-volume training in the snatch, clean & jerk, or squat exercises among experienced junior weightlifters.”
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
MODERATE RESISTANCE TRAINING VOLUME PRODUCES MORE FAVORABLE STRENGTH GAINS THAN HIGH OR LOW VOLUMES DURING A SHORT‐TERM TRAINING CYCLE
The study found that lifting a lot more reps didn’t make experienced young weightlifters stronger than lifting fewer reps — both groups improved about the same, so doing more work doesn’t always mean better results.