quantitative
Analysis v1
66
Pro
0
Against

Even though one method showed a tiny bit more muscle growth, it was so small that it wouldn’t make any noticeable difference in how your arms look or feel.

Scientific Claim

The difference in elbow flexor hypertrophy between traditional training and Tonal 1 drop-set training is statistically significant but falls below the pre-registered threshold for practical relevance (0.14 cm), suggesting the advantage is not meaningful in real-world settings.

Original Statement

Elbow flexor hypertrophy was significantly greater in TRAD ... however, the contrast between conditions was considered practically equivalent as it did not exceed the preregistered smallest effect size of interest (0.14 cm).

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

definitive

Can make definitive causal claims

Assessment Explanation

The claim is a direct reporting of the study’s preregistered analysis and interpretation. It is not inferential but descriptive of the authors’ own evaluation, making definitive language appropriate.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

66

The study found that traditional lifting made muscles slightly bigger than Tonal’s drop-set method, but the difference was so small that it doesn’t really matter in real life.

Contradicting (0)

0
No contradicting evidence found