If you lift heavy weights, you get better at doing more reps with heavy weights; if you lift light weights, you get better at doing more reps with light weights — your muscles adapt specifically to the weight you use.
Scientific Claim
Resistance training with higher loads (80–90% 1RM) produces greater improvements in heavy-load absolute muscle endurance than lower loads (30–50% 1RM) in untrained young women, while lower-load training produces greater improvements in light-load absolute muscle endurance, indicating load-specific adaptations.
Original Statement
“HL training induced a larger improvement in heavy load AME (HL: 9.3 ± 4.3 vs. LL: 7.5 ± 7.1 repetitions, time × limb P < 0.01) and LL training induced a larger improvement in light load AME (LL: 24.7 ± 22.2 vs. HL: 15.2 ± 16.7 repetitions, time × limb P = 0.04).”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
probability
Can suggest probability/likelihood
Assessment Explanation
Although this is an RCT allowing causal inference, the small sample size (n=16) and unknown blinding status limit confidence. 'Produces' is acceptable but should be qualified as probabilistic per EBM guidance.
More Accurate Statement
“Resistance training with higher loads (80–90% 1RM) is likely to produce greater improvements in heavy-load absolute muscle endurance than lower loads (30–50% 1RM) in untrained young women, while lower-load training is likely to produce greater improvements in light-load absolute muscle endurance, indicating load-specific adaptations.”
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Higher- and lower-load resistance exercise training induce load-specific local muscle endurance changes in young women: a randomised trial.
When women trained with heavy weights, they got better at lifting heavy weights; when they trained with light weights, they got better at lifting light weights — each type of training made them stronger in the exact way they trained.