48
Pro
0
Against

If you want to get stronger at squats, doing squats is way better than doing leg extensions—but if you want to get stronger at leg extensions, both exercises work about the same.

Scientific Claim

Back squat training leads to greater improvements in back squat 3RM strength (+46.7%) compared to leg extension training (+21.3%) in untrained young women after 8 weeks, while both exercises produce similar gains in leg extension 3RM strength (+19.8% vs. +23.4%), suggesting strength gains are more specific to the trained movement pattern.

Original Statement

Smith machine back squat induced greater increases in 3RM-SQ (+46.7 vs. 21.3%; p < 0.001), but no between-group difference was observed in 3RM-LE increases (SQ = +19.8% vs. LE = +23.4%; p = 0.824).

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

probability

Can suggest probability/likelihood

Assessment Explanation

The RCT design supports causal claims, but the abstract does not confirm blinding or control of confounders. 'Leads to' should be softened to 'likely leads to' to reflect conservative interpretation.

More Accurate Statement

Back squat training likely leads to greater improvements in back squat 3RM strength (+46.7%) compared to leg extension training (+21.3%) in untrained young women after 8 weeks, while both exercises likely produce similar gains in leg extension 3RM strength (+19.8% vs. +23.4%), suggesting strength gains are more specific to the trained movement pattern.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

48

People who did squats got much stronger at squats, but not necessarily at leg extensions, and people who did leg extensions got just as strong at leg extensions as the squatters did—so your body gets stronger at the exact exercise you practice.

Contradicting (0)

0
No contradicting evidence found