descriptive
Analysis v1
Strong Support

Rabbits’ ears get clogged more easily than human skin when tested with the same products, so the rabbit test might be too strict and flag things that don’t actually clog human pores.

24
Pro
0
Against

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

24

Community contributions welcome

24

A human model for assessing comedogenic substances.

Cross-Sectional Study
Human
1982 Nov

The study found that rabbits’ ears pick up more skin-clogging substances than human skin does, so if something clogs rabbit pores, it might not clog human pores — meaning rabbits are better at spotting troublemakers.

Contradicting (0)

0

Community contributions welcome

No contradicting evidence found

Gold Standard Evidence Needed

According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.