quantitative
Analysis v1
41
Pro
0
Against

Using a waist size of 86.5 cm instead of general cutoffs identifies about 1.5 times more men with spinal cord injuries as having metabolic syndrome across different diagnostic criteria.

Scientific Claim

In men with chronic spinal cord injury, using a waist circumference cutoff of 86.5 cm is associated with a 1.5-fold increase in metabolic syndrome prevalence across NCEP ATP III (22% vs 8%), AHA (22% vs 14%), and IDF (25% vs 14%) definitions compared to general population criteria.

Original Statement

When the SCI specific criteria, listed in Table 1B, was applied the prevalence of MetS was found to be 22%, 22% and 25% using the NCEP, AHA and IDF. Compared to the general population cutoff point, the risk of developing MetS was 1.5-fold greater than using NCEP, AHA, and IDF.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

association

Can only show association/correlation

Assessment Explanation

The study is observational and demonstrates associations, so using 'associated with' is appropriate. No causation is claimed.

Evidence from Studies

Contradicting (0)

0
No contradicting evidence found