We can’t be sure if saturated fat is good or bad for you because the studies are all over the place—some say one thing, others say the opposite, and the measurements aren’t very accurate.
Scientific Claim
The quality of evidence linking saturated fat to health outcomes is rated as very low by GRADE criteria due to high heterogeneity, imprecision, and risk of bias in observational studies, meaning future research could substantially change current conclusions.
Original Statement
“The certainty of associations between saturated fat and all outcomes was 'very low,' mainly because of low precision and high inconsistency... further research is likely to have an important effect on our confidence in the estimation of association and could change the estimate.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
association
Can only show association/correlation
Assessment Explanation
The claim accurately describes the GRADE assessment, which is a formal evaluation of evidence quality. The authors explicitly state this conclusion and use appropriate language.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Unknown Title
This big study looked at lots of older research and found that we can’t be sure if saturated fat is good or bad for you because the studies didn’t agree much and had lots of problems — so we might change our minds later if new studies come out.