We don’t know yet if skipping meals sometimes helps human brains work better — we need more studies to find out.
Scientific Claim
Evidence on the cognitive effects of intermittent fasting in humans is insufficient, and further research is required to assess its outcomes.
Original Statement
“Further research is required to assess cognitive outcomes of IF in humans.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design cannot support claim
Appropriate Language Strength
association
Can only show association/correlation
Assessment Explanation
The statement is a direct quote and reflects the authors’ explicit judgment on evidence gaps. No overstatement is present; the language is appropriately cautious and accurate for a narrative review.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Unknown Title
The study says we know intermittent fasting helps brains in animals, but we don’t yet know for sure if it helps human brains the same way—and we need more studies to find out.