When people who already lift weights do either mostly heavy lifts or mostly lighter lifts—but keep the total amount of work the same—both ways make them just as strong after 8 weeks.
Scientific Claim
In resistance-trained young men, 8 weeks of volume-equated high-repetition (12, 10, 8 reps) and low-repetition (6, 4, 2 reps) daily undulating periodization programs produce similar increases in one-repetition maximum strength for squat and bench press, suggesting repetition range may not be a critical factor for strength gains when total volume is matched.
Original Statement
“Both groups significantly increased 1RM strength for both squat and bench press (p < 0.01), and no group differences existed (p > 0.05).”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
overstated
Study Design Support
Design cannot support claim
Appropriate Language Strength
association
Can only show association/correlation
Assessment Explanation
The abstract does not confirm randomization, so causation cannot be established. The claim implies equivalence as a general rule, but the study only shows an association under specific conditions in trained males. Verb strength must be conservative.
More Accurate Statement
“In resistance-trained young men, 8 weeks of volume-equated high-repetition and low-repetition daily undulating periodization programs are associated with similar increases in one-repetition maximum strength for squat and bench press, suggesting that when total training volume is matched, repetition range may not strongly influence strength outcomes.”
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Volume-equated high- and low-repetition daily undulating programming strategies produce similar hypertrophy and strength adaptations.
Both groups lifted different numbers of reps but the same total amount of weight, and both got just as strong—so how many reps you do doesn’t matter as much as how much total weight you lift.