When trained men do different types of chest presses—using a machine, barbell, or dumbbells—their chest muscles and shoulder strength bounce back at about the same rate after a tough workout, no matter how stable the equipment is.
Scientific Claim
In resistance-trained men, three chest press variations—Smith machine, barbell, and dumbbell—produce similar recovery patterns in pectoralis major muscle thickness and shoulder horizontal adductor peak torque over 96 hours after a high-volume resistance protocol, indicating that stability demands do not significantly alter hypertrophic or strength recovery in these muscles.
Original Statement
“There were no differences in the time course of PT or muscle thickness values of the pectoralis major (p = 0.98 and p = 0.91, respectively) or elbow extensors (p = 0.07 and p = 0.86, respectively) between groups.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
definitive
Can make definitive causal claims
Assessment Explanation
The RCT design with random assignment, controlled protocol, and direct measurement of physiological outcomes supports definitive causal language. The p-values confirm no significant differences, justifying the claim.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Chest Press Exercises With Different Stability Requirements Result in Similar Muscle Damage Recovery in Resistance-Trained Men
The study found that whether guys used a machine, barbell, or dumbbells for chest presses, their chest muscles recovered at the same rate in strength and size over four days — so stability doesn’t matter for recovery in this case.