47
Pro
0
Against

When trained men do different types of chest presses—using a machine, barbell, or dumbbells—their chest muscles and shoulder strength bounce back at about the same rate after a tough workout, no matter how stable the equipment is.

Scientific Claim

In resistance-trained men, three chest press variations—Smith machine, barbell, and dumbbell—produce similar recovery patterns in pectoralis major muscle thickness and shoulder horizontal adductor peak torque over 96 hours after a high-volume resistance protocol, indicating that stability demands do not significantly alter hypertrophic or strength recovery in these muscles.

Original Statement

There were no differences in the time course of PT or muscle thickness values of the pectoralis major (p = 0.98 and p = 0.91, respectively) or elbow extensors (p = 0.07 and p = 0.86, respectively) between groups.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

definitive

Can make definitive causal claims

Assessment Explanation

The RCT design with random assignment, controlled protocol, and direct measurement of physiological outcomes supports definitive causal language. The p-values confirm no significant differences, justifying the claim.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

47

The study found that whether guys used a machine, barbell, or dumbbells for chest presses, their chest muscles recovered at the same rate in strength and size over four days — so stability doesn’t matter for recovery in this case.

Contradicting (0)

0
No contradicting evidence found