View

The Study

Three‐dimensional study of pectoralis major muscle and tendon architecture

In simple terms

This study looked at 11 dead bodies to see how the chest muscle is built. It can tell us what the muscle looks like, but it can't tell us how it works or what happens if it gets hurt.

26%

Analysis score

26/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology1
Publication100
Statistical23
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists looked at dead bodies' chest muscles to see how they are built. They took pictures and made 3D models to understand the shape and layers.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
26

26 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes, because knowing the exact shape helps doctors fix torn chest muscles better.
  2. 2The chest muscle has two parts: one with even fibers and one with 6–7 sections.
  3. 3The bottom section bends forward to hold the one above.
  4. 4The tendon has two layers, and there's no twist.
  5. 5Fibers get longer from top to bottom in the upper part, and are longest in the middle sections of the lower part.
  6. 6The angle of the fibers is steeper in the upper part (29.4°) than the lower (20.6°).

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Clinical Anatomy

Year

2009

Authors

Lillia Y. Fung, B. Wong, K. Ravichandiran, A. Agur, Tim Rindlisbacher, A. Elmaraghy

122 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.