View

The Study

Potentially relevant incidental findings on research whole-body MRI in the general adult population: frequencies and management

In simple terms

This study counted how many people had unexpected health findings on a full-body MRI scan. It tells us how common those findings are, but it doesn’t prove that the MRI caused anything or that finding them helps people live longer.

36%

Analysis score

36/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology25
Publication100
Statistical31
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists scanned 2,500 healthy adults' whole bodies to see what unexpected things they'd find. Most findings weren't clearly good or bad, but some needed urgent attention.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
36

36 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — nearly 1 in 3 people got news about something potentially important, but most findings were confusing and needed more tests.
  2. 236.2% of people had unexpected findings; 57.7% of those were unclear if harmful; 0.4% needed immediate care; 31.5% of people got told about at least one finding.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

European Radiology

Year

2013

Authors

K. Hegenscheid, Rebecca Seipel, C. Schmidt, H. Völzke, J. Kühn, R. Biffar, H. Kroemer, N. Hosten, R. Puls

146 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.