View

The Study

Meat, money and messaging: How the environmental and health harms of red and processed meat consumption are framed by the meat industry.

In simple terms

This study looked at websites and reports from 6 big meat industry groups in the UK to see how they talk about health and climate issues. It found 4 main ways they downplay risks and encourage people to keep eating meat. It tells us what messages they use, but not whether those messages actually change what people think or do.

20%

Analysis score

20/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology1
Publication100
Statistical0
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Meat companies in the UK say eating meat is fine, even healthy, and not bad for the planet. They say science hasn’t proven meat is dangerous and that most people eat a safe amount.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
20

20 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1These messages may make people feel okay about eating meat, even when science says less is better for health and the planet.
  2. 26 meat industry groups said people don’t need to eat less meat.
  3. 3They said meat has important nutrients and farming in the UK is eco-friendly.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Food policy

Year

2022

Authors

Kathryn Clare, N. Maani, J. Milner

Open Access
39 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.