View

The Study

Effects of creatine monohydrate supplementation during combined strength and high intensity rowing training on performance.

In simple terms

This study looked at rowers who took creatine and others who didn’t, and saw that both groups got stronger and faster in about the same way. But we don’t know if the creatine group was picked fairly, so we can’t say creatine made the difference — it might just be that both groups trained hard.

32%

Analysis score

32/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology34
Publication100
Statistical0
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Rowers trained hard for 6 weeks with weights and rowing. Some took creatine, some took sugar pills. Both groups got stronger and faster, but creatine didn't help them get any better than the sugar pills.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
32

32 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — the training itself made rowers significantly better, but adding creatine made no extra difference.
  2. 2After 6 weeks, both groups improved: body composition got better, 2,000m rowing time got faster, power during intervals went up, and strength increased.
  3. 3Creatine group did not do more reps or produce more power than placebo group.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee

Year

2001

Authors

D. Syrotuik, A. Game, E. Gillies, G. Bell

62 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.