View

The Study

The effects of eccentric phase tempo in squats on hypertrophy, strength, and contractile properties of the quadriceps femoris muscle

In simple terms

This study is like a fair race between two groups of people who did squats with different speeds on the way down. One group went slow, one went fast. After 7 weeks, the slow group got a bit stronger and their big leg muscle grew more. We can say slow squats probably helped more — but we can’t say it’s the best way for everyone, because only 18 people tried it.

68%

Analysis score

68/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology58
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

People who slowed down the downward part of their squats for 7 weeks got slightly more muscle growth in one part of their thigh and got stronger faster than those who did it quickly.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
68

68 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — the difference in strength and one muscle’s growth is meaningful and likely noticeable in real life, though overall thigh size didn’t change between groups.
  2. 2Slow tempo group: 1.74 effect size for vastus lateralis growth, 1.60 for strength gain.
  3. 3Fast tempo group: 1.37 for growth, 0.99 for strength.
  4. 4Both groups got stiffer muscles.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Frontiers in Physiology

Year

2025

Authors

Filip Kojić, Danimir Mandić, Sasa Duric

Open Access
9 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.