mechanistic
neutral effect
No Evidence

A theory based on how particles move in response to concentration differences explains the exclusion zone phenomenon better than the idea of a new water phase, matching what scientists have observed in experiments.

Scientific Claim

Schurr's diffusiophoresis theory provides a compelling explanation for EZ phenomena, including the time course of EZ growth, pH gradients near Nafion surfaces, and measured repulsive force fields, which align with experimental observations.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

probability

Can suggest probability/likelihood

Assessment Explanation

The study is a review of existing evidence, not a new experimental study. While it presents Schurr's theory as compelling, it does not prove it definitively. 'Provides a compelling explanation' is appropriate for a review that synthesizes evidence.

Source Excerpt

Schurr’s theory of macroscopic chemotaxis presents a compelling alternative theory which can explain experimental findings which Pollack’s theory cannot, such as the precise time course of EZ growth, pH gradients emanating from the surface of Nafion, and the decaying forcefield measured by experiments with optical tweezers.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting Evidence (1)

Why it supports

The study explicitly states that Schurr's diffusiophoresis theory explains multiple experimental observations that Pollack's theory cannot, including time course of EZ growth, pH gradients, and forcefield measurements. This is presented as a key finding of the review.