In healthy young men, performing resistance training twice a week for six weeks, using either 10 or 20 repetitions per set to failure, leads to similar increases in muscle thickness of the thigh...
Mechanism
Synthesis from 1 study
Pushing your muscles until they can't do another rep — whether with heavy or light weights — creates a chemical environment inside them that tells them to build more protein. This extra protein makes the muscle fibers thicker, and that’s why both training styles lead to similar growth. The key...
Most probable mechanism
When you lift weights until you can't do another rep, your muscles run out of energy and build up waste products. This triggers signals inside the muscle cells that tell them to make more protein, which causes the muscle fibers to grow thicker over time. It doesn't matter if you use heavier weights for fewer reps or lighter weights for more reps — as long as you push to exhaustion, the same cellular signals turn on and lead to similar muscle growth.
Resistance training to concentric failure induces metabolic stress through accumulation of metabolites such as lactate, hydrogen ions, and inorganic phosphate within muscle fibers
Metabolic stress activates intracellular signaling pathways including mTORC1 and MAPK, which increase the rate of muscle protein synthesis
Elevated protein synthesis exceeds baseline protein breakdown, resulting in net accretion of myofibrillar proteins and increased muscle fiber cross-sectional area
Increased myofibrillar protein content manifests as measurable thickening of the vastus lateralis muscle
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Community contributions welcome
Similar improvements in skeletal muscle oxidative capacity after moderate (10-RM) and high repetition (20-RM) resistance training.
Contradicting (0)
Community contributions welcome
Gold Standard Evidence Needed
According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.