The Claim

In well-trained male kayak sprint athletes, both resistance-type and paddling-based high-intensity interval training increase resting stroke volume and left ventricular end-diastolic volume, with no statistically significant difference between the two training modalities.

Source: Effects of a New Form of Resistance-Type High-Intensity Interval Training on Cardiac Structure, Hemodynamics, and Physiological and Performance Adaptations in Well-Trained Kayak Sprint Athletes

What the research says

Supports is higher

Support is ahead, but a single strong opposing study can change this.

Supports
62score
Challenges
0score

These are independent scores, not a percentage. Higher-grade studies count more, so a single strong opposing study can outweigh several weaker ones.

Cause and effect
1 study reviewed
In plain English

In elite male kayak sprinters, both resistance training and paddling-based high-intensity interval training increase the amount of blood the heart holds and pumps at rest, and the two types of training produce the same effect.

See the scientific wording

In well-trained male kayak sprint athletes, both resistance-type and paddling-based high-intensity interval training improve resting stroke volume and left ventricular end-diastolic volume, indicating enhanced cardiac filling capacity, with no significant difference between the two training modalities.

Why this might work

Repeated high-intensity exercise pushes more blood back to the heart, stretching the left ventricle to hold more blood, and makes the heart muscle contract more forcefully, so each beat pumps out more blood.

Verified mechanismbased on 1 study

What the research says

1 study
  1. Study: Effects of a New Form of Resistance-Type High-Intensity Interval Training on Cardiac Structure, Hemodynamics, and Physiological and Performance Adaptations in Well-Trained Kayak Sprint Athletes

    In elite kayak athletes, both intense resistance training and intense paddling workouts made the heart better at filling with blood at rest — and both worked about the same. Neither was clearly better than the other for this specific heart benefit.

Score breakdown, mechanism chain, raw evidence, ideal studies needed & 1 supporting studies

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health claims into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.