The Claim

Six months of 15% and 35% caloric restriction is associated with improved sperm motility (50.0-56.6%) in 12-month-old male Wistar rats compared to controls (43.8%), with benefits maintained at 12 months (40.2-43.0% vs 25.3% in controls).

Source: Effect of Chronic Moderate Caloric Restriction on the Reproductive Function in Aged Male Wistar Rats

What the research says

Challenges is higher

Challenge is ahead, but a single strong supporting study can change this.

Supports
0score
Challenges
10score

These are independent scores, not a percentage. Higher-grade studies count more, so a single strong opposing study can outweigh several weaker ones.

Correlation
1 study reviewed
In plain English

Eating less food for six months helped older male rats have better swimming sperm, and this improvement lasted for a year compared to rats that ate normally.

See the scientific wording

Six months of 15% and 35% caloric restriction is associated with improved sperm motility (50.0-56.6%) in 12-month-old male Wistar rats compared to controls (43.8%), with benefits maintained at 12 months (40.2-43.0% vs 25.3% in controls).

What the research says

1 study
  1. Study: Effect of Chronic Moderate Caloric Restriction on the Reproductive Function in Aged Male Wistar Rats

    The study says the good effects on sperm movement didn't last for a full year, but the claim says they did, so the study contradicts the claim.

Score breakdown, mechanism chain, raw evidence, ideal studies needed & 1 supporting studies

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health claims into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.