During intense military training, women tend to eat more calories than men, but both end up with similar energy deficits, suggesting their bodies may process or use energy differently.
Mechanism
Synthesis from 1 study
Female soldiers eat more than males during intense training, but both lose the same amount of energy — this suggests women’s bodies may burn less energy at rest or during daily activity, conserving calories more efficiently, as seen in 10.1249/mss.0000000000004013.
Most probable mechanism
When female soldiers eat more food during intense training, their bodies may use that energy more efficiently — meaning they burn less of it as heat or for basic functions — so even though they eat more, they still lose the same amount of energy as men. This is suggested by the fact that women eat more but end up in the same energy deficit as men, as seen in 10.1249/mss.0000000000004013.
Female soldiers increase dietary energy intake to a greater extent than male soldiers during prolonged military training, yet both sexes achieve similar magnitudes of negative energy balance, indicating a difference in how energy is utilized or conserved.
Metabolic efficiency may increase in females during energy deficit, reducing resting metabolic rate or non-exercise activity thermogenesis relative to energy intake, allowing greater energy conservation despite higher intake.
Hormonal adaptations, such as lower leptin and higher ghrelin levels in females under energy stress, may promote energy conservation by reducing thermogenesis and increasing appetite drive, aligning with observed intake patterns and energy balance outcomes.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Community contributions welcome
Limited Sex Differences in Energy Balance and Body Composition during 61+D of US Army Ranger Training
Contradicting (0)
Community contributions welcome
Gold Standard Evidence Needed
According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.