Even after accounting for factors like body weight, exercise habits, smoking, and mother's education level, eating more processed foods didn't consistently change breast density measurements.
Scientific Claim
The study found no significant association between ultra-processed food consumption and breast density when adjusting for BMI, physical activity, tobacco use, maternal education, and other potential confounders.
Original Statement
“Simple and multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between UPF consumption (calories and grams, categorized in quartiles according to the sample distribution) and BD outcomes, adjusting for confounders such as birth weight, body mass index, tobacco use, physical activity, menstrual cycle stage, maternal education, age at menarche, total energy consumption, and maternal BD. [...] No consistent associations were observed between UPF intake and %FGV and AFGV.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
association
Can only show association/correlation
Assessment Explanation
The claim correctly states 'no significant association' and specifies that this was after adjusting for multiple confounders, which accurately reflects the study's methodology and findings. The language appropriately avoids causal language.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Consumption of ultraprocessed foods and breast density in adolescence