When looking at how much of the total calories came from processed foods (instead of how many grams), there was no consistent link to breast density at any point in the menstrual cycle.
Scientific Claim
The study found no significant association between ultra-processed food consumption and breast density when measured as a percentage of calories, regardless of menstrual cycle phase.
Original Statement
“No significant associations were found between quartiles of UPF intake (as a percentage of calories) and log-transformed %FGV or AFGV. [...] In the adjusted model, girls in Q2 of UPF consumption (as a percentage of grams) had 12% increase in %FGV [...] however we did not observe differences comparing Q3 and Q4 against Q1. No significant associations were found for participants in the luteal phase.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
association
Can only show association/correlation
Assessment Explanation
The claim correctly states 'no significant association' and specifies the measurement method (percentage of calories), which accurately reflects the study's findings. The language appropriately avoids causal language and specifies the context of the finding.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Consumption of ultraprocessed foods and breast density in adolescence