Even after sleeping only 3.5 hours a night for three nights, young men burned the same total amount of energy and used the same mix of carbs and fats as when they slept 7 hours.
Scientific Claim
Three nights of shortened sleep (3.5 hours per night) in healthy young men did not cause a significant change in total 48-hour energy expenditure (3717 vs. 3741 kcal/d, p=0.508) or respiratory quotient (0.883 vs. 0.885, p=0.519), indicating no measurable effect on overall metabolic rate or fuel utilization.
Original Statement
“Sleep restriction did not affect total EE or substrate utilisation. The 48-h total energy expenditure (TEE) did not differ significantly between the 7-h and 3.5-h sleep conditions (p = 0.508). The 48-h respiratory quotient (RQ) values did not differ significantly between sleep conditions (p = 0.519).”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
definitive
Can make definitive causal claims
Assessment Explanation
The RCT with precise, continuous calorimetry provides high-quality evidence to support definitive language. The p-values clearly indicate no effect, and the sample size was powered to detect differences.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Effect of shortened sleep on energy expenditure, core body temperature, and appetite: a human randomised crossover trial
The study found that sleeping only 3.5 hours a night for three nights didn’t change how many calories the body burned or what type of fuel it used, even though people felt hungrier.