When young men slept less, they burned a little more energy during the night because they were awake longer—but this extra burn didn’t add up to more total energy burned over the whole day.
Scientific Claim
Three nights of shortened sleep (3.5 hours per night) in healthy young men caused a significant increase in nighttime energy expenditure (by 55 kcal, p<0.001) during the sleep restriction night, likely due to prolonged wakefulness, but this was offset by no change in total daily energy expenditure.
Original Statement
“Night-time EE on day 3 (00:00 to 07:00) was higher in the 3.5-h sleep condition than in the 7-h sleep condition (7-h sleep, 409 ± 37 kcal/d; 3.5-h sleep, 464 ± 45 kcal/d, p < 0.001). The 48-h total energy expenditure (TEE) did not differ significantly between the 7-h and 3.5-h sleep conditions.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
definitive
Can make definitive causal claims
Assessment Explanation
The continuous calorimetry and statistical analysis of hourly data support definitive causal language. The distinction between nighttime spike and total EE is clearly documented and justified.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (0)
Contradicting (1)
Effect of shortened sleep on energy expenditure, core body temperature, and appetite: a human randomised crossover trial
The study found that sleeping less didn’t make people burn more calories overall or even at night — it just made them hungrier, which could lead to eating more and gaining weight.