When young men do intense leg workouts, their body releases more lactate and cortisol—stress and energy chemicals—but that doesn’t mean they’ll grow bigger muscles or get stronger faster than if those chemicals stayed low.
Claim Language
Language Strength
association
Uses association language (linked to, correlated with)
The claim uses 'increases' (definitive) for lactate/cortisol changes but 'do not correlate with' (association) for muscle and strength outcomes. The key conclusion hinges on 'correlate,' which is an association-level term, making the overall language strength associative due to its focus on lack of relationship rather than causation.
Context Details
Domain
exercise_science
Population
human
Subject
young men
Action
increases... but do not correlate with
Target
plasma lactate and cortisol acutely after high-volume leg exercise; muscle hypertrophy or strength gains compared to low-hormone conditions
Intervention Details
Gold Standard Evidence Needed
According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Elevations in ostensibly anabolic hormones with resistance exercise enhance neither training-induced muscle hypertrophy nor strength of the elbow flexors.
The study had guys do arm exercises with and without extra leg workouts that spike stress and metabolic hormones. Even though their hormone levels went way up with the extra leg work, their arms got just as strong and muscular either way — so those hormone spikes didn’t help.