Even though guys lifted less weight per rep with dumbbells, they did more reps to make up for it, so the total weight lifted ended up being about the same for everyone.
Scientific Claim
The total training volume lifted during 8 sets of 10RM chest press is statistically equivalent across Smith machine, barbell, and dumbbell conditions in resistance-trained men, despite differences in load per repetition.
Original Statement
“However, the total amount of weight lifted during each training protocol (10RM loading) did not differ between the Smith machine (14,218.0 ± 3743.0 kg), barbell (14,411.0 ± 3986.9 kg), and dumbbell groups (12,077.0 ± 2915.0 kg) (F = 3.0, p = 0.69).”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
definitive
Can make definitive causal claims
Assessment Explanation
The RCT design included precise volume calculations and statistical testing (ANOVA), supporting definitive language. The claim accurately reflects the matched volume design.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Chest Press Exercises With Different Stability Requirements Result in Similar Muscle Damage Recovery in Resistance-Trained Men
Even though each type of chest press used different weights, the study found that all three versions caused the same amount of muscle fatigue and recovery, meaning the total work done was basically the same.