Even though one sandwich is made with real ingredients and the other with processed stuff, people feel just as full after eating both — so the difference in calorie burning isn’t because one makes...

Pro

Against

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (0)

Community contributions welcome

No supporting evidence found

Contradicting (1)

Community contributions welcome

Postprandial energy expenditure in whole-food and processed-food meals: implications for daily energy expenditure

Randomized Controlled Trial

Human

2010 Jul 2

Gold Standard Evidence Needed

According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.

Source Study

Postprandial energy expenditure in whole-food and processed-food meals: implications for daily energy expenditure

Score: 51

DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v54i0.5144

Similar Assertions

Even though one sandwich is made with real ingredients and the other with processed stuff, people feel just as full after eating both — so the extra calories burned after the whole-food sandwich isn’t because they felt fuller.

94%

Even though your body burns more calories digesting a sandwich made with real ingredients, you don’t feel any fuller than if you ate one made with processed ingredients.

90%

Even though one sandwich is made with real ingredients and the other with processed stuff, people feel just as full after eating both — the body doesn’t tell the difference in fullness.

90%

Your body keeps burning calories longer after eating a sandwich made with real ingredients than one made with processed stuff — about an extra hour.

81%

Consuming whole foods increases postprandial energy expenditure compared to isoenergetic ultraprocessed foods due to higher digestive effort and reduced thermodynamic efficiency.

74%