correlational
Analysis v1
51
Pro
0
Against

How full or hungry people feel doesn’t explain why they eat more or less after choosing their own meal.

Scientific Claim

In adults consuming a high-protein diet under ad-libitum conditions, changes in daily caloric intake following a self-selected meal are not predicted by changes in subjective hunger or satiety ratings.

Original Statement

On the SSM day, the mean ± SD daily caloric intake increased by 262 ± 332 kcal compared to the previous study days (P < 0.001), with no changes in subjective appetite scores. [...] The following day there was a slight but significant reduction in intake [...] with no change in appetite scores.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

definitive

Can make definitive causal claims

Assessment Explanation

The claim accurately reflects the absence of association between appetite scores and intake changes, as directly measured and reported.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

51

People ate more calories after choosing their own meal, even though they didn’t feel hungrier or fuller than usual—meaning how hungry they felt didn’t predict how much they ate.

Contradicting (0)

0
No contradicting evidence found