correlational
Analysis v1
51
Pro
0
Against

What you eat in one meal matters more for how many calories you eat that day than how hungry or full you feel.

Scientific Claim

In adults on a long-term ad-libitum high-protein diet, the total daily caloric intake is more strongly influenced by the macronutrient composition of a single self-selected meal than by subjective appetite ratings.

Original Statement

On the SSM day, percent protein intake was inversely associated mean daily caloric intake (r2 = 0.22, P = 0.03). [...] with no changes in subjective appetite scores.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

overstated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

association

Can only show association/correlation

Assessment Explanation

The claim implies a comparative strength ('more strongly influenced') that requires statistical testing of effect sizes between variables, which was not performed.

More Accurate Statement

In adults on a long-term ad-libitum high-protein diet, the macronutrient composition of a single self-selected meal is associated with daily caloric intake, while subjective appetite ratings show no consistent association.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

51

When people ate one meal with less protein during a long-term study, they ended up eating way more calories that day—even though they didn’t feel hungrier or fuller than usual. This means what’s in the meal matters more than how hungry you feel.

Contradicting (0)

0
No contradicting evidence found