If you’re already strong and trained, you don’t need fancy workout tricks like pyramids or going to failure to get the best results—just do the same total work with any method.
Scientific Claim
In well-trained men, the absence of significant differences in muscle hypertrophy, strength, and architecture between crescent pyramid, drop-set, and traditional resistance training suggests that these specialized methods do not provide a superior stimulus for adaptation when volume is controlled, and may be unnecessary for maximizing results.
Original Statement
“CP and DS systems do not promote greater gains in strength, muscle hypertrophy and changes in muscle architecture compared to traditional resistance training.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
definitive
Can make definitive causal claims
Assessment Explanation
The study’s design, outcomes, and conclusion are aligned. The claim accurately reflects the totality of evidence and is appropriately stated with definitive language.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
When trained guys used three different workout styles but did the same total amount of work, all three styles built muscle and strength equally well — so the fancy methods aren’t better than the simple one.