The Claim

In non-diabetic pregnant women, hemoglobin and hematocrit levels are weak but statistically significant predictors of HbA1c values in linear regression analysis (P = 0.044 and P = 0.047, respectively), whereas MCHC and PDW do not remain significant predictors after adjustment for confounding variables.

Source: Glycated hemoglobin and red blood cell indices in non-diabetic pregnant women

What the research says

Supports is higher

Support is ahead, but a single strong opposing study can change this.

Supports
37score
Challenges
0score

These are independent scores, not a percentage. Higher-grade studies count more, so a single strong opposing study can outweigh several weaker ones.

Correlation
1 study reviewed
In plain English

In pregnant women who don’t have diabetes, blood traits like hemoglobin and hematocrit can slightly predict their average blood sugar levels — but other traits like MCHC and PDW don’t hold up when we adjust for other factors.

See the scientific wording

In non-diabetic pregnant women, hemoglobin and hematocrit levels weakly but significantly predict HbA1c values in linear regression analysis (P = 0.044 and P = 0.047, respectively), while MCHC and PDW do not remain significant predictors after adjustment.

What the research says

1 study
  1. Study: Glycated hemoglobin and red blood cell indices in non-diabetic pregnant women

    The study looked at blood markers in pregnant women without diabetes and found that hemoglobin and hematocrit levels can weakly but significantly predict HbA1c, just like the claim says. Other markers like MCHC and PDW didn’t hold up after adjusting for other factors.

Score breakdown, mechanism chain, raw evidence, ideal studies needed & 1 supporting studies

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health claims into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.