For men with prostate cancer who are on active surveillance (monitoring instead of immediate treatment), low testosterone levels are linked to a higher chance that their cancer will progress to a more aggressive grade.
See the scientific wording
Low testosterone levels are associated with an increased risk of higher-grade progression in prostate cancer patients undergoing active surveillance.
Correlational — new studies may shift this
Observational4 good-quality studies link this claim to the outcome, but causation is not established.
What the research says
4 studies reviewedSupporting (2)
Cohort StudyHuman2026
This study found that men with low testosterone were 61% more likely to develop a more aggressive prostate cancer (Grade Group 3 or higher) while on active surveillance, which supports the idea that low testosterone is linked to higher risk of cancer progression.
Cohort StudyHuman2017
This study found that men with low-risk prostate cancer who had low testosterone levels were more likely to have aggressive cancer when examined after surgery, suggesting that low testosterone is linked to a higher chance of cancer progression, which supports the claim.
Contradicting (2)
Cohort StudyHuman2016
Men with low testosterone who took testosterone supplements did not have a higher chance of their prostate cancer getting worse compared to those who didn't take testosterone, so low testosterone might not actually increase risk.
Systematic ReviewReview2025
The study looked at men with low testosterone who were monitoring their prostate cancer, and found that giving them testosterone didn't make their cancer more likely to get worse, suggesting that low testosterone isn't actually linked to higher risk of progression.
Quality-weighted scoring: we follow the GRADE framework — each study is rated High, Moderate, Low, or Very Low based on study design, methodology rigor, and risk of bias. A single high-quality RCT can outweigh several weaker observational studies.
Scores reflect study quality, not just count.
Score breakdown, mechanism chain, raw evidence, ideal studies needed & 2 supporting, 2 contradicting studies
How Fit Body Science checks a claim
- 1
We isolate the claim
Health advice from videos, articles and studies is broken down into single, testable claims.
- 2
We find the research
Each claim is matched against peer-reviewed studies, with every source cited by DOI.
- 3
We grade the evidence
Studies are scored on methodology, statistical rigor, transparency and publication quality.
The fitness and health internet is full of confident claims. We check them against real research.
Every claim on this site is traced back to peer-reviewed studies, scored on methodology and reporting quality, and given a verdict you can audit yourself — sources, DOIs and all.
- Full evidence breakdown and mechanism chains
- Ask our AI anything about a claim or its studies
- Get notified when new research changes a verdict