descriptive
Analysis v1
Strong Support
A lot of the most popular fitness studies only looked at how people improved on their own after a workout or supplement, not how they did compared to people who didn’t do anything — which might make those treatments seem way more effective than they really are.
40
0
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
40
Community contributions welcome
40
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Common Errors in Meta-Analyses and Meta-Regressions in Strength & Conditioning Research
Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
2023 FebThe study found that almost half of the most popular science reviews in strength training used flawed methods by only looking at how people changed within their own group, not how they compared to a control group — exactly what the claim says.
Contradicting (0)
0
Community contributions welcome
No contradicting evidence found
Gold Standard Evidence Needed
According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.