descriptive
Analysis v1
Strong Support
A lot of big studies that combine other studies on strength and fitness didn’t properly handle cases where the same people were measured multiple times or when one study had several groups — this made their results look more precise and important than they really were.
40
0
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
40
Community contributions welcome
40
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Common Errors in Meta-Analyses and Meta-Regressions in Strength & Conditioning Research
Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
2023 FebThis study checked 20 top science reviews in strength training and found that almost half made a math mistake by not realizing that some data came from the same people or groups, making their results look more certain than they really are — which is exactly what the claim says.
Contradicting (0)
0
Community contributions welcome
No contradicting evidence found
Gold Standard Evidence Needed
According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.