The Claim
FDG-PET/CT and whole-body MRI demonstrate high concordance in the detection of bone disease in multiple myeloma, but discordance occurs in approximately 10% of cases, with whole-body MRI being favored in those instances.
What the research says
Supports is higher
Support is ahead, but a single strong opposing study can change this.
These are independent scores, not a percentage. Higher-grade studies count more, so a single strong opposing study can outweigh several weaker ones.
When doctors use two different scans to check for bone damage in multiple myeloma, they usually get the same results—but about 1 in 10 times, the MRI sees something the PET/CT scan misses.
See the scientific wording
FDG-PET/CT and whole-body MRI show high concordance in detecting bone disease in multiple myeloma, but discordance occurs in approximately 10% of cases, primarily favoring WB-MRI.
What the research says
1 studyThe study found that both scans usually agree on whether a patient has bone disease, but when they disagree, the MRI is more likely to spot the problem — just like the claim says.
Score breakdown, mechanism chain, raw evidence, ideal studies needed & 1 supporting studies
Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.