correlational
Analysis v1
0
Pro
48
Against

Older studies showed bigger strength gains from weight training than newer ones, probably because today’s studies are better designed and less biased.

Scientific Claim

Resistance training studies with older publication dates report larger strength gains, likely due to methodological improvements and reduced bias in more recent trials, which may have attenuated effect sizes over time.

Original Statement

Older studies accounted for the variation in muscle strength in the overall analysis (P = 0.021)... the larger effect found in the study by Anderson and Kearney also seems to be explained by the low-load resistance training prescription involving more repetitions...

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

probability

Can suggest probability/likelihood

Assessment Explanation

The claim is based on a statistically significant meta-regression result and is appropriately framed as a correlation with a plausible explanation, consistent with the study’s probabilistic verb guidelines.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (0)

0
No supporting evidence found

Contradicting (1)

48

This study looks at which weightlifting loads work best today, but it doesn’t compare old studies to new ones, so we can’t tell if older studies overreported gains.