quantitative
Analysis v1
Strong Support
When checking for ovarian cancer, using a combination of tests finds more cancers early than using just an ultrasound, but both methods are really good at saying you don’t have cancer when you really don’t.
75
0
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
75
Community contributions welcome
75
Mortality impact, risks, and benefits of general population screening for ovarian cancer: the UKCTOCS randomised controlled trial.
Randomized Controlled Trial
Human
2025 MayThe study checked two ways to find ovarian cancer early: one uses a blood test plus ultrasound, and the other uses ultrasound alone. It found that the blood-plus-ultrasound method caught more cancers (83.8% vs 72.2%) and both were very good at saying you didn’t have cancer (99.8% vs 99.5%), which is exactly what the claim says.
Contradicting (0)
0
Community contributions welcome
No contradicting evidence found
Gold Standard Evidence Needed
According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.