Drinking a lot of diet sodas or drinks with artificial sweeteners might increase your chances of having a stroke, and the more you drink, the higher the risk could be.

20

Pro

0

Against

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

20

Community contributions welcome

20

Sweet Surprises: An In-depth Systematic Review of Artificial Sweeteners and Their Association with Cerebrovascular Accidents

Systematic Review

Human

2024 Jun

The study looked at people who drink diet sodas and found that the more they drink, the higher their chance of having a stroke, especially a certain type called ischemic stroke.

Contradicting (0)

0

Community contributions welcome

No contradicting evidence found

Gold Standard Evidence Needed

According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.

Source Study

Sweet Surprises: An In-depth Systematic Review of Artificial Sweeteners and Their Association with Cerebrovascular Accidents

Score: 20

DOI: 10.1007/s13668-024-00537-9

Similar Assertions

Drinking a lot of diet sodas or foods with artificial sweeteners might increase your chances of having a stroke, especially the kind caused by a blocked blood vessel in the brain.

20

0

91%

Drinking one or more diet sodas every day might be linked to a higher chance of dying from any cause, especially heart problems or stroke — even though these sweeteners are considered safe by regulators.

48

0

86%

People who drink diet sodas and other artificially sweetened drinks may be more likely to have a stroke, heart disease, or even die sooner — even if they’re not overweight or don’t smoke.

1

0

86%

Drinking or eating a lot of artificial sweeteners might increase your chances of having a stroke or a mini-stroke, according to a study of over 100,000 French adults followed for nearly a decade.

58

0

85%

Women and Black people might be more affected by artificial sweeteners when it comes to stroke risk, suggesting these groups could be more vulnerable due to what they eat.

20

0

83%