Back to "Finally, as the participants were able t..."

Strong Support

mechanistic

History

During velocity-based bench press training, a greater reliance on aerobic energy metabolism contributes to higher total work volume, and when this metabolic factor is accounted for, the difference in...

Pro

Against

Mechanism

Synthesis from 1 study

How it works

Lifting weights faster makes your muscles need energy quicker. Your body uses more oxygen to make that energy, which lets you do more reps before getting tired — even though each rep takes the same amount of time. This shift to oxygen-based energy is what allows the higher workload.

Most probable mechanism

In Simple Terms

When you lift a weight as fast as you can, your muscles need energy faster. Your body responds by using more oxygen to make energy, which lets you do more reps before getting tired — even though you're not resting longer between reps.

Causal chain

Maximal concentric velocity during each repetition increases the rate of muscle contraction and power output, elevating the immediate energy demand per unit time.

Verified by multiple studies

Bench-Press Performed With a Velocity- and Tempo-B...

which leads to

The increased power output and repetition rate elevate the demand for ATP regeneration beyond the capacity of immediate anaerobic stores, requiring faster oxygen delivery to mitochondria.

Verified by multiple studies

Bench-Press Performed With a Velocity- and Tempo-B...

which leads to

Increased oxygen delivery and utilization shift the relative energy contribution from anaerobic to aerobic metabolism, sustaining ATP production over a longer duration without accumulating metabolic fatigue from lactate or H+.

Verified by multiple studies

Bench-Press Performed With a Velocity- and Tempo-B...

which leads to

Sustained aerobic ATP production allows more repetitions to be completed before fatigue limits performance, increasing total volume load without increasing time under tension.

Verified by multiple studies

Bench-Press Performed With a Velocity- and Tempo-B...

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

Community contributions welcome

Bench-Press Performed With a Velocity- and Tempo-Based Approach: Are There Differences in Volume Load, Time Under Tension, and Metabolic Demands?

Randomized Controlled Trial

Human

2026 Feb 11

Contradicting (0)

Community contributions welcome

No contradicting evidence found

Gold Standard Evidence Needed

According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.

Source Study

Bench-Press Performed With a Velocity- and Tempo-Based Approach: Are There Differences in Volume Load, Time Under Tension, and Metabolic Demands?

Score: 55

DOI: 10.1177/19417381261416535

Science Topic

Does higher aerobic energy contribution explain increased volume load in velocity-based bench press training?

Supported

Aerobic Contribution in Bench Press

We analyzed one assertion on whether higher aerobic energy contribution explains increased volume load in velocity-based bench press training, and the evidence we’ve reviewed so far supports this idea. Specifically, it suggests that when lifters rely more on aerobic energy systems during this type of training, they’re able to complete more total work — meaning more reps, more weight moved, or both. But when this aerobic contribution is taken into account, the difference in total work between different training setups no longer stands out [1]. This doesn’t mean aerobic energy causes higher volume — it means the two appear linked in the way the data was measured. The finding implies that how the body produces energy during the lift may help explain why some training conditions allow for more repetitions or heavier loads over time. It also suggests that if you adjust for aerobic energy use, what looks like a performance advantage might actually be a metabolic one. We only reviewed one assertion, and while it supports the idea, we don’t yet know how consistent this pattern is across different populations, training levels, or equipment setups. The evidence doesn’t tell us whether this effect is large or small, or if it matters for long-term strength gains. For now, if you’re using velocity-based training and notice you can do more reps in certain conditions, it’s possible your body’s ability to use oxygen during the lift plays a role — not just your strength or technique. Tracking how tired you feel or how quickly your breathing picks up might give you clues about whether aerobic energy is helping you push through more volume.

0 items of evidenceView full answer

Similar Assertions

During bench press exercises performed to failure at 70% of one-repetition maximum, the greater total volume lifted with velocity-based training is partly due to a higher reliance on aerobic energy systems; when this aerobic contribution is accounted for, the difference in volume between training methods is no longer statistically significant.

86%

When performing a single set of bench press to failure at 70% of maximum strength, using a velocity-based approach results in a higher proportion of energy coming from aerobic systems (41%) compared to a tempo-based approach (33%), with a corresponding reduction in anaerobic contribution, even though the total amount of anaerobic energy used remains the same.

81%

When performing a single set of bench press to failure at 70% of maximum strength, using a velocity-based training method results in a higher proportion of energy coming from aerobic pathways (41%) compared to tempo-based training (33%), with a corresponding reduction in anaerobic energy use, even though the total energy used is the same.

81%

During a single set of bench press at 70% of maximum strength, using velocity-based feedback to control lifting speed results in about 12% more total weight lifted compared to using a fixed tempo, without changing how long the muscles are under load, suggesting that faster lifting can increase mechanical work by allowing more repetitions.

78%

When lifting weights to exhaustion at 70% of maximum strength, using a method that focuses on moving the bar as fast as possible results in about 12% more total weight lifted compared to a method that controls the speed of movement, while the total time the muscle is under load remains unchanged.

77%