descriptive
Analysis v1
48
Pro
0
Against

This study only looked at how many sets and how often you lift — it didn’t check how hard you lift or what exercises you do, so those factors could still matter a lot.

Scientific Claim

The study does not assess the effects of training intensity, proximity to failure, or exercise selection on hypertrophy or strength, limiting its ability to provide a complete picture of resistance training dose-response.

Original Statement

We aimed to explore the dose–response relationships between key resistance training dosage variables (weekly set volume and frequency) and strength and hypertrophy.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

association

Can only show association/correlation

Assessment Explanation

The claim accurately reflects the study’s stated scope and does not overreach. It is a factual description of methodological boundaries.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

48

This study only looked at how many sets and how often people trained, but didn’t check how hard they pushed or which exercises they did — so it doesn’t give the full story on how to build muscle or strength.

Contradicting (0)

0
No contradicting evidence found