Training with low weights and continuous muscle tension doesn't reduce your body's ability to use oxygen during exercise, meaning it doesn't hurt your cardiovascular fitness.
Evidence from Studies
No evidence studies found yet.
What Would Prove This
Per GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this claim, ordered from strongest to weakest.
Whether LISTR has no effect on aerobic capacity (VO2max) compared to CST or other resistance training methods across diverse populations.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing LISTR, CST, and control groups, including only studies with direct VO2max measurement via gas analysis, training duration ≥6 weeks, and controlled aerobic activity.
Whether LISTR causes no change in maximal oxygen consumption compared to CST or no training.
A double-blind, randomized controlled trial with 100 healthy men aged 18–30, randomized to LISTR, CST, or control, with VO2max measured via treadmill gas analysis before and after 8 weeks of training, with controlled aerobic activity.
Whether individuals who regularly use LISTR maintain stable aerobic capacity over time compared to those using CST.
A prospective cohort study following 400 resistance-trained adults for 12 months, tracking training method (LISTR vs. CST), weekly aerobic activity, and VO2max measured quarterly, adjusting for diet and sleep.
Whether individuals currently using LISTR have similar VO2max levels as those using CST.
A cross-sectional assessment of 300 gym-goers comparing current training method (LISTR vs. CST) with one-time VO2max measurement via cycle ergometer, controlling for aerobic training volume.
Whether isolated cases of LISTR users report stable aerobic performance despite resistance training.
A case series of 10 individuals using LISTR for ≥6 months with documented pre/post VO2max measurements and no change in aerobic training.