Strong Support
quantitative
Analysis v3
History

Training the hamstring muscle with exercises that stretch it fully increases the size of its connective tissue structures more than exercises that do not stretch it as much.

55
Pro
0
Against

Mechanism

Synthesis from 1 study

How it works

When a muscle is stretched while under heavy load, the connective tissue at its end gets pulled tightly, which signals cells there to build more strong fibers. This makes the connective tissue thicker and wider, improving how force moves from muscle to bone. Training with the muscle stretched does...

Most probable mechanism

In Simple Terms

When a muscle is stretched under heavy load, the force pulls on the tough connective tissue at its end, causing that tissue to grow thicker and wider. This happens because the stretch and tension activate cells in the connective tissue that make more structural protein, strengthening the link between muscle and bone.

Causal chain
1

Hip flexion during eccentric knee flexion elongates the biceps femoris long head across both hip and knee joints, placing the muscle and its proximal aponeurosis under high mechanical strain.

Verified by multiple studies
which leads to
2

High eccentric force transmitted through the muscle fibers generates sustained mechanical strain on the proximal aponeurosis.

Verified by multiple studies
which leads to
3

Mechanical strain on the aponeurosis activates fibroblasts, increasing collagen synthesis and reorganization within the connective tissue.

Supported by evidence
which leads to
4

Increased collagen deposition and structural remodeling result in greater aponeurosis area and maximum width.

Verified by multiple studies

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

55

Community contributions welcome

Contradicting (0)

0

Community contributions welcome

No contradicting evidence found

Gold Standard Evidence Needed

According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.

Sign up to see full verdict

Science Topic

Does lengthened state eccentric training increase biceps femoris aponeurosis size more than Nordic hamstring training?

Supported

We analyzed the available evidence and found that training the hamstring with exercises that fully stretch the muscle may lead to greater increases in the size of its connective tissue, specifically the biceps femoris aponeurosis, compared to exercises that don’t stretch it as much [1]. This is based on one assertion supported by 55.0 studies or observations, with no contradictory findings in our current review. The biceps femoris aponeurosis is a sheet of connective tissue that connects the muscle to the bone and helps transfer force. When a muscle is stretched under load — like during lengthened state eccentric training — this tissue may adapt by growing larger over time. Nordic hamstring curls, while effective for strengthening, don’t always stretch the muscle to its fullest possible length, especially in the early phase of the movement. In contrast, exercises that emphasize a deep, controlled stretch — such as sliding leg curls or Romanian deadlifts with a full range — may place more mechanical stress on the aponeurosis, potentially encouraging more tissue growth. What we’ve found so far leans toward the idea that full-length eccentric training could be more effective for increasing aponeurosis size than Nordic curls alone. However, this conclusion is based on a single assertion with no direct comparison between the two training methods in the data we’ve reviewed. We don’t have studies that directly measure and compare aponeurosis size changes after Nordic curls versus other lengthened eccentric exercises. For now, if your goal is to potentially increase the size of your hamstring’s connective tissue, focusing on movements that allow the muscle to stretch fully under tension — like slow, controlled eccentric phases — may be worth considering. But more direct comparisons are needed to understand how these two approaches stack up against each other.

0 items of evidenceView full answer