quantitative
Analysis v1
Strong Support
Some trainers count all your lifts to measure workout volume, but this claim says a smarter way is to count only the hard sets fully and give half credit to the lighter, supporting ones — and that this method actually predicts muscle growth and strength gains better than the other ways.
48
0
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
48
Community contributions welcome
48
The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains.
Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
Human
2026 FebThis study found that counting only the most important sets (direct) and giving half credit to less direct ones (indirect) works better than just counting all sets or only the direct ones — so yes, the method in the claim is the best one found.
Contradicting (0)
0
Community contributions welcome
No contradicting evidence found
Gold Standard Evidence Needed
According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.