When muscles get bigger from lifting weights, the way we measure it (ultrasound vs. body scan) doesn’t always line up—so they might be capturing different kinds of changes, not just muscle growth.
Scientific Claim
Muscle thickness increases measured via ultrasound at the mid-thigh rectus femoris are not strongly correlated with changes in thigh lean tissue mass measured by DXA in resistance-trained individuals undergoing either cluster or traditional training, suggesting these measures may reflect different aspects of tissue adaptation.
Original Statement
“In addition, no statistically significant (p > 0.05) correlations were found between changes in muscle thickness and lean mass for both the CS (R = 0.009) and TS (R = 0.506) groups.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
association
Can only show association/correlation
Assessment Explanation
The claim correctly describes a correlation observed in the data without implying causation. The language is appropriate for a correlational finding from a within-subject design.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Cluster sets and traditional sets elicit similar muscular hypertrophy: a volume and effort-matched study in resistance-trained individuals
The study found that both types of workouts made thighs bigger and leaner, but didn’t show that how much the muscle looked bigger on ultrasound matched up tightly with how much lean mass increased on the DXA scan—so they’re probably measuring different things.