correlational
Analysis v1
45
Pro
0
Against

When muscles get bigger from lifting weights, the way we measure it (ultrasound vs. body scan) doesn’t always line up—so they might be capturing different kinds of changes, not just muscle growth.

Scientific Claim

Muscle thickness increases measured via ultrasound at the mid-thigh rectus femoris are not strongly correlated with changes in thigh lean tissue mass measured by DXA in resistance-trained individuals undergoing either cluster or traditional training, suggesting these measures may reflect different aspects of tissue adaptation.

Original Statement

In addition, no statistically significant (p > 0.05) correlations were found between changes in muscle thickness and lean mass for both the CS (R = 0.009) and TS (R = 0.506) groups.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

association

Can only show association/correlation

Assessment Explanation

The claim correctly describes a correlation observed in the data without implying causation. The language is appropriate for a correlational finding from a within-subject design.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

45

The study found that both types of workouts made thighs bigger and leaner, but didn’t show that how much the muscle looked bigger on ultrasound matched up tightly with how much lean mass increased on the DXA scan—so they’re probably measuring different things.

Contradicting (0)

0
No contradicting evidence found