If you're an adult with a certain type of unhealthy cholesterol, cutting carbs while eating fewer calories might help you lose more weight and body fat over 3 months than cutting fat instead — the type of food you restrict could matter for how your body changes.

40

Pro

0

Against

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

40

Community contributions welcome

40

Carbohydrate Restriction has a More Favorable Impact on the Metabolic Syndrome than a Low Fat Diet

Randomized Controlled Trial

Human

2009 Apr

The study found that people who ate fewer carbs lost more weight and body fat than those who ate less fat, which is exactly what the claim says.

Contradicting (0)

0

Community contributions welcome

No contradicting evidence found

Gold Standard Evidence Needed

According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.

Source Study

Carbohydrate Restriction has a More Favorable Impact on the Metabolic Syndrome than a Low Fat Diet

Score: 40

DOI: 10.1007/s11745-008-3274-2

Similar Assertions

For adults with unhealthy cholesterol levels, cutting carbs while eating fewer calories seems to improve heart-related blood fats more than a low-fat diet over 12 weeks.

40

0

85%

For adults with a certain type of unhealthy cholesterol and blood sugar issues, cutting carbs way down for 12 weeks might lower insulin and blood sugar more than a low-fat diet — meaning it could help control blood sugar better.

40

0

85%

For adults with unhealthy cholesterol levels, cutting carbs and calories for 12 weeks might improve heart disease risk more than a low-fat diet, based on deeper blood fat measures.

40

0

84%

Eating fewer carbs and more fat—without counting calories—can help people lose about as much weight as eating less fat and cutting calories. This suggests that what you eat might matter just as much as how much you eat.

0

46

77%