quantitative
Analysis v1
54
0
When testing the belly fat prediction equations in men, the average difference from DXA measurements was small (1.31%), with most predictions falling within a range of -4.08% to 6.71%.
Scientific Claim
Cross-validation of QCT-based prediction equations for total body fat percentage in Chinese men shows a mean difference of 1.31% and limits of agreement from -4.08% to 6.71% compared to DXA measurements.
Original Statement
“Predicted TBF% Male (L1/L2) -5.00 1.145 0.87 2.68 1.31 -4.08 to 6.71”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
probability
Can suggest probability/likelihood
Assessment Explanation
The claim accurately reports statistical validation metrics without implying clinical utility beyond the study population, which is appropriate for observational data.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
54
54
Assessment of whole-body and regional body fat using abdominal quantitative computed tomography in Chinese women and men
Cross-Sectional Study
Human
2024 Feb 14Contradicting (0)
0
No contradicting evidence found