correlational
Analysis v1
Strong Support
When scientists say there's a 100% chance that more volume or frequency leads to a better result, they don't mean it definitely causes it—they just mean the data strongly suggests a link, but other factors could still be involved.
48
0
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
48
Community contributions welcome
48
The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains.
Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
Human
2026 FebThe study found that doing more sets or training more often usually leads to bigger muscles or stronger muscles, but it doesn’t say it definitely causes it — just that it’s very likely related. This matches the claim that 100% probability means strong evidence of a link, not proof it’s the cause.
Contradicting (0)
0
Community contributions welcome
No contradicting evidence found
Gold Standard Evidence Needed
According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.