The Claim
Subgroup analyses of 5 female-only and 11 male-only studies indicate that women demonstrate a large and statistically significant benefit from fast velocity resistance training compared to slow velocity training for strength adaptations (Hedges' g = 0.95, p < 0.001), while men show no significant difference (Hedges' g = 0.08, p = 0.58).
What the research says
Supports is higher
Support is ahead, but a single strong opposing study can change this.
These are independent scores, not a percentage. Higher-grade studies count more, so a single strong opposing study can outweigh several weaker ones.
When women do fast weightlifting exercises, they get much stronger compared to slow lifting, but men don't see much difference between fast and slow lifting.
See the scientific wording
Women show a large and statistically significant benefit from fast velocity resistance training over slow velocity training for strength adaptations (Hedges' g = 0.95, p < 0.001), whereas men show no significant difference (Hedges' g = 0.08, p = 0.58), based on subgroup analyses of 5 female-only and 11 male-only studies.
What the research says
1 studyStudy: Intentionally Slow Concentric Velocity Resistance Exercise and Strength Adaptations: A Meta-Analysis
The study looked at fast vs. slow weight training and found that women get much stronger with fast training, but men don't see a big difference, which matches the claim exactly.
Score breakdown, mechanism chain, raw evidence, ideal studies needed & 1 supporting studies
Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.